Commercial Recovery Systems Archives

Massachusetts Lawsuit: Commercial Recovery Systems

On behalf of our clients, Lemberg & Associates recently filed a complaint in U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, against Commercial Recovery Systems. Our client alleges that Commercial Recovery Systems left a voice message that falsely stated the caller was a “lead investigator” calling “for restitution.” The caller threatened to garnish our client’s income and said that she would waive her rights if she didn’t return his call by 4:00 p.m. The caller didn’t say that he was calling from Commercial Recovery Systems or that he was attempting to collect a debt.

Our client returned the call and left a message saying that she didn’t know him or where he was calling from. She asked to be sent a letter and asked not to be called again. Several days later, our client received another voicemail threatening garnishment. She returned the call, again requesting a letter and asked that Commercial Recovery Systems stop calling. She said that she was disabled and could not pay the debt. She subsequently received another call, but when she answered there was no one on the line. She called the number back and was connected to another “lead investigator.” Our client told him that she had repeatedly asked Commercial Recovery Systems to stop calling and to instead send a letter. The person she spoke with said that a constable would come to her house to serve her with court papers. He threatened our client with “federal” garnishment and seizure of her bank account and other assets. He also threatened to garnish her future earnings for up to ten years. He told her that the court date “is on Monday.”

Commercial Recovery Systems called our client seven times within 14 minutes. Our client answered one of the calls and informed Commercial Recovery Systems that she had an attorney and told them to stop calling. Nevertheless, Commercial Recovery Systems called twice more – this time on her cell phone. When our client asked how Commercial Recovery Systems had gotten her cell phone number, Commercial Recovery Systems said it was through the court system.

The lawsuit charges that Commercial Recovery Systems violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by contacting our client knowing she was represented by an attorney; by engaging in harassing behavior; by not disclosing the identity of the debt collection agency during a call; by using false, deceptive, or misleading representation in connection with the collection of a debt; by misrepresenting the character, amount, and legal status of a debt; by threatening our client with garnishment; by threatening our client with attachment of property; by threatening to take legal action without actually intending to do so; by employing false and deceptive means to collect a debt; by failing to inform our client that the phone call was an attempt to collect a debt; and by failing to send a validation notice. In addition, the lawsuit charges that Commercial Recovery Systems invaded our client’s privacy.

CRS: From Our Case Files

On behalf of our client, Lemberg & Associates recently filed a complaint in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, against Commercial Recovery Systems. Our client alleges that Commercial Recovery Systems contacted her, and that she told them she would discuss payment after she had received written correspondence. Commercial Recovery Systems continued to call, despite failing to send our client a letter. Commercial Recovery Systems then called our client’s workplace, and threatened to sue her and serve her with a summons and legal complaint at work. Commercial Recovery Systems placed as many as four calls a day to our client’s cell phone and workplace.

The lawsuit charges that Commercial Recovery Systems violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by engaging in harassing behavior; by contacting our client at a place and time known to be inconvenient; by misrepresenting the character, amount, and legal status of a debt; by threatening to take legal action without actually intending to do so; and by failing to send a letter within five days of initial contact. In addition, the lawsuit charges that Commercial Recovery Systems violated the Texas Debt Collection Act and invaded our client’s privacy.

Commercial Recovery Systems: Texas Lawsuit Filed

On behalf of our client, Lemberg & Associates recently filed a complaint in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, against Commercial Recovery Systems. Our client alleges that he asked Commercial Recovery Systems to provide him with a letter outlining the debt collector’s attempts to collect the debt. He explained to Commercial Recovery Systems that the debt belonged to his ex-wife, and he requested a 30-day validation notice so he could dispute or request validation of the debt. After being asking several times, Commercial Recovery Systems agreed to send our client a fax. Our client gave Commercial Recovery Systems his employer’s fax number, and told Commercial Recovery Systems to send the fax immediately. He told Commercial Recovery Systems that his job could be in jeopardy unless the debt collector sent the fax at the time they agreed. When the fax didn’t arrive, our client called Commercial Recovery Systems and told them not to fax. They faxed anyway. In addition, a debt collector from Commercial Recovery Systems threatened to garnish our client’s wages, and place a lien on his home and bank account. Further, Commercial Recovery Systems left several voicemails reiterating these threats.

The lawsuit charges that Commercial Recovery Systems violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by engaging in harassing behavior; by not disclosing the identity of the debt collection agency during a call; by using false, deceptive, or misleading representation in connection with the collection of a debt; by misrepresenting the character, amount, and legal status of a debt; by threatening garnishment; by threatening the attachment of property; by threatening to take legal action without actually intending to do so; by employing false and deceptive means to collect a debt; and by failing to send a letter within five days of initial contact. In addition, the lawsuit charges that Commercial Recovery Systems violated the Texas Debt Collection Act and invaded our client’s privacy.

Commercial Recovery Systems: From Our Case Files

On behalf of our clients, Lemberg & Associates recently filed a complaint in U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana, against Commercial Recovery Systems. Our client alleges that Commercial Recovery Systems called her workplace, but didn’t identify itself or the creditor. Our client asked Commercial Recovery Systems to send her a letter, but alleges that Commercial Recovery Systems refused to do so. Commercial Recovery Systems called her at work again, and threatened to immediately garnish her wages if she didn’t make an immediate payment. Although our client told Commercial Recovery Systems to stop calling her at work and that her employer didn’t allow calls, Commercial Recovery Systems kept calling her at work. Commercial Recovery Systems told her that it was planning to talk to human resources because “We need to get the ball rolling on the garnishment.” Commercial Recovery Systems didn’t send our client written notification about the debt.

The lawsuit charges that Commercial Recovery Systems violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by contacting our client at a place and time known to be inconvenient; by contacting our client as her workplace, knowing that her employer prohibited such calls; by engaging in harassing behavior; by not disclosing the identity of the debt collection agency during a call; by misrepresenting the legal status of a debt; by threatening garnishment; by employing false and deceptive means to collect a debt; and by failing to send a validation notice. The lawsuit also charges that Commercial Recovery Systems violated the Louisiana Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, invaded our client’s privacy, and intentionally inflicted emotional distress.

From Our Case Files: Commercial Recovery Systems

On behalf of our clients, Lemberg & Associates recently filed a complaint in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, against Commercial Recovery Systems. Our client alleges that Commercial Recovery Systems sent him a letter informing him of the debt and his right to dispute the debt within 30 days. However, Commercial Recovery Systems called him a few days after he received the letter, telling him that he had to make payment arrangements by a date that was before the 30 days had elapsed, and that Commercial Recovery Systems would take “another course of action” if they didn’t reach a payment agreement. Commercial Recovery Systems also left a voicemail threatening to “take a different route” if our client did not return the call by the end of the day. Commercial Recovery Systems has not taken legal action.

The lawsuit charges that Commercial Recovery Systems violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by engaging in harassing behavior; by misrepresenting the character, amount, and legal status of a debt; by threatening to take legal action without actually intending to do so; and by employing false and deceptive means to collect a debt. The lawsuit also charges that Commercial Recovery Systems violated the Texas Debt Collection Act.

Commercial Recovery Systems: How Low Can You Go?

A Texas woman says she has suffered immeasurably at the hands of Commercial Recovery Systems, a third-party debt collection agency. In Flynn v. Commercial Recovery Systems (U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division), it is alleged that the debt collection agency went beyond the pale in attempting to collect a debt. The complaint alleges that the debt collector called Flynn’s cell phone up to six times a day, and called her octogenarian parents at 7:00 a.m. and told them that there was a warrant for Flynn’s arrest. Moreover, the debt collector allegedly threatened to come to Flynn’s house, and to arrive with a law enforcement agent. Added to the mix are allegations that Commercial Recovery Systems allegedly failed to send Flynn the mandated 5-day notification letter, nor informed her of her right to dispute the debt. The suit, filed by Lemberg & Associates on behalf of Ms. Flynn, cites numerous violations of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, as well as the Texas Debt Collection Act.